RecordArc public release R21
Skip to main content

DECISION PROOF LAB

A model changed. Find the past decisions that may need review.

Use one continuous synthetic payment story to find affected decisions, understand one decision, test what can be proven, inspect a system disagreement, and verify a bounded proof snapshot.

The public Lab is frontend-only, synthetic, read-only and off-path. It is designed to make the product experience tangible without exposing the private backend or using customer data.

Interactive synthetic demonstrationFrontend-onlyNo customer dataNo source writeback

PUBLIC PRODUCT JOURNEY

  1. 01
    ChallengeChoose what changed
  2. 02
    ImpactFind affected decisions
  3. 03
    InspectOpen proof, gaps and conflicts
Review outcomes stay humanSource outcomes stay authoritative

THREE PUBLIC EXPERIENCES

One interactive investigation, one deep decision inspector and one adjacent applicability example.

The Lab prioritizes depth over a large catalogue of shallow demos. Future domains remain clearly separated from what visitors can actually test today.

FLAGSHIP / BANKING & PAYMENTSInteractive

Model Change Impact Investigation

Choose a defective model, changed rule or source-mapping issue. Filter directly impacted, potentially impacted and unaffected decisions; inspect why each decision is included; then open its proof state.

Start investigation
DEEP INSPECTIONSynthetic reconstruction

Payment Decision Proof Twin

Inspect retained payment, authentication, risk, configuration, human-action and outcome context for one decision, with chronology and limitations visible.

Inspect decision
ADJACENT APPLICABILITYSynthetic example

AML Alert Review Proof

See how the same Decision Proof pattern applies to a different source workflow without turning RecordArc into an AML monitoring, case or filing system.

Explore AML example

IMAGINE THIS HAPPENED

A bank discovers that Risk Model 2.3 may require review after payment decisions have already been made.

Your job is to find which past decisions may be affected, understand one decision, test what the retained evidence can prove, expose disagreements, and identify what needs human review.

Start investigation

YOUR INVESTIGATION

Follow the question in front of you; inspect the technical evidence when you need it.

The existing expert workspace remains directly usable. This visible sequence explains where you are, why the current view matters, and what to inspect next.

  1. 01

    What changed?

    Start with the challenge

    A model, rule, policy, configuration or source mapping changes or is challenged after decisions have already been made.

  2. 02

    Find affected decisions

    Decision Impact Radar

    Find the decisions directly affected, potentially affected or supported as unaffected by the retained evidence.

  3. 03

    Understand one decision

    Decision Proof Twin

    See the retained evidence, versions, human actions and outcomes around one decision.

  4. 04

    Test what can be proven

    Challenge Readiness

    See which questions are answered, partial, blocked, conflicting or not applicable — and why.

  5. 05

    Find system disagreements

    Cross-System Divergence

    Expose contradictory retained outcomes or evidence without deciding which source is correct.

  6. 06

    Review and carry the proof

    Human Review Cohort · Portable Proof Capsule

    Identify the decisions that need authorized investigation and provide a bounded evidence snapshot with limitations and integrity information.

Loading synthetic Decision Impact workspace…

WHAT YOU CAN ACTUALLY DO

The flagship Lab behaves like a small product, not a static marketing mockup.

Every public control is intentionally tied to a meaningful decision-proof task.

01Choose a challenge

Switch between a model defect, rule change and mapping issue.

02Filter the population

Compare direct, potential and unaffected decisions.

03Inspect one Twin

Open evidence, governing versions, human actions and recorded outcomes.

04Challenge the proof

Open answered, partial, blocked and conflicting proof questions.

05Verify integrity

Verify a synthetic proof capsule, then simulate modified evidence and see it fail.

FUTURE APPLICABILITY

Other regulated decisions may reuse the pattern after the first wedge is validated.

KYC/KYB, sanctions, credit and other high-impact decisions remain future applicability — not equal public product experiences today.

FUTURE

KYC / KYB

Future applicability

FUTURE

Sanctions review

Future applicability

FUTURE

Credit decisions

Future applicability

FUTURE

Insurance decisions

Future applicability

FUTURE

AI / agent governance

Future applicability

FUTURE

Other regulated decisions

Future applicability

Review the broader application horizon.

START WITH THE FLAGSHIP

Challenge the synthetic decision population yourself.

Use the interactive Radar first, then drill into an individual payment decision if you want the deeper proof chronology.